Today is a big day for our country. It’s AV referendum day and you need to make your voice heard.
Unless enough people go out and vote, Britain could sleepwalk into a system that damages our democracy permanently. So I urge you to get down the polling station and vote ‘No’ to AV.
Remember, there are five big reasons why:
One – AV is complex. First Past the Post is so simple you can sum it up in seven words: the person with the most votes wins. AV is so confusing that when I was recently interviewed on the BBC, it became clear that one of their most experienced broadcasters didn’t understand how it worked.
Two – AV is unfair. With First Past the Post, everyone gets one vote, and that vote is counted once. That’s fair. But under AV, supporters of extremist or fringe parties can get their votes counted again and again and again. That’s unfair. It’s simply not right that the fifth vote of a Monster Raving Looney supporter counts as much as your first vote.
Three – AV takes power away from people and gives it to politicians. The great thing about our current system is that it always lets you kick dead-duck governments out on their ear. Remember 1979? Remember last year? Under AV, that sort of people power would be much less likely. It would mean more grey areas in election results, and more opportunities for tired politicians to cling on to power long after their time. Just think – if we’d had AV last year, Gordon Brown could still be in Downing Street today.
Four – AV is costly. Money is tight at the moment, so why get rid of a system that is cheap to administer for one that will inevitably cost more and bring loads more bureaucracy? I know, you know, that our money could be better spent on other things.
Five – AV is unpopular. First Past the Post is used by half the planet, from the world’s biggest democracy – India – to the world’s most powerful democracy – America. AV is used in just three countries: Australia, Fiji and Papua New Guinea. And in Australia, they want to get rid of it.
Let the final word go to our greatest ever Prime Minister, Winston Churchill. He described AV as “the stupidest, the least scientific and the most unreal” voting system. He said it would mean elections are “determined by the most worthless votes given for the most worthless candidates”. He’s right. The campaigners for AV are wrong. So I urge you all to get down to the polling station today and vote ‘No’.
( 8 comments ) Tags: Alternative Vote, Australia, AV, Fiji, No to AV, Papua New Guinea, polling station, referendum, Winston Churchill









Comment by Norma Huxter on May 5, 2011 at 8:14 am
I’ve already voted, I have a postal vote and I voted NO!
Comment by Stuart Cato on May 5, 2011 at 11:30 am
I went to vote and asked what it is I’m voting for and was told “Whether you want a referendum or not” – I said isn’t this the referendum and they seemed totally confused!! What does it say about the outcome if the electoral officers don’t know what its all about??
Comment by Ron Edgcumbe on May 5, 2011 at 5:43 pm
Voted NO at 2pm in Cornwall very low turnout about 20% Hopefully it will pick up later !!
Comment by alan gordenfelt on May 5, 2011 at 6:24 pm
i voted no
Comment by robertr123 on May 5, 2011 at 6:37 pm
i voted No – No No No No No No NO!
Comment by peter everingham on May 5, 2011 at 8:49 pm
i voted NO earlier then drove round picking my neighbours up so they could vote NO NO NO !!!!
Comment by Arnold Whittle on May 5, 2011 at 9:29 pm
Today me and my wife voted NO to AV we support the Conservative party only we do not support the other parties that are trying to change the voting system to stengthen the position within the government arena, if AV is voted through the political system will be destroyed forever and this country will never recover from destructive condition that Labour left this country in. We must keep our tried and tested system of voting or this country will turn into a basket case in the near future.
Comment by Lesley Whitfield on May 8, 2011 at 8:24 pm
It is wrong to say that AV undermines the principle of 1 person 1 vote, (since while my 2nd preference vote is being counted your 1st preference vote counts AGAIN – unless you vote for an unpopular party like the BNP, and fail to supply sufficient alternatives). The Electoral Commission was incidentally very happy to confirm this point on their helpline.
I wonder what proportion of NO voters understood this? If you did understand this point, but voted NO, it would be good to hear from you, since I do object to the message in some parts of the media that NO voters did not know what they were doing.