﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask me your questions on the Copenhagen summit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The real John Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/comment-page-1/#comment-12440</link>
		<dc:creator>The real John Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conservatives.com/?p=1038#comment-12440</guid>
		<description>Oh Dear!  It&#039;s not looking good.  Now NASA have been found manipulating the GISS temp data to show 2005 as the warmest year on record.  Sooo, that&#039;s 2 of the main 4 data sets shown to be fraudulent...

This bandwagon has to be stopped now.

 http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.rss.html?pid=30000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Dear!  It&#8217;s not looking good.  Now NASA have been found manipulating the GISS temp data to show 2005 as the warmest year on record.  Sooo, that&#8217;s 2 of the main 4 data sets shown to be fraudulent&#8230;</p>
<p>This bandwagon has to be stopped now.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.rss.html?pid=30000" rel="nofollow">http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.rss.html?pid=30000</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The real John Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/comment-page-1/#comment-12290</link>
		<dc:creator>The real John Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conservatives.com/?p=1038#comment-12290</guid>
		<description>Greg,

People are seeing through this Climate Change scam now.  We&#039;ve really had enough of it and more and more people simply don&#039;t believe it - for very good reasons!

And, I&#039;m bloomin&#039; freezing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>People are seeing through this Climate Change scam now.  We&#8217;ve really had enough of it and more and more people simply don&#8217;t believe it &#8211; for very good reasons!</p>
<p>And, I&#8217;m bloomin&#8217; freezing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/comment-page-1/#comment-11478</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conservatives.com/?p=1038#comment-11478</guid>
		<description>Concentrate on developing a population policy, stopping immigration would be a start. By all means continue recycling and energy saving, but if this country only contributes about 3% to global CO2 why bother with all of this climate change tosh when it appears figures have been fiddled to suit vested interests. Use of resources will only be controlled when population globaly is controlled</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concentrate on developing a population policy, stopping immigration would be a start. By all means continue recycling and energy saving, but if this country only contributes about 3% to global CO2 why bother with all of this climate change tosh when it appears figures have been fiddled to suit vested interests. Use of resources will only be controlled when population globaly is controlled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Blogg</title>
		<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/comment-page-1/#comment-10060</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Blogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conservatives.com/?p=1038#comment-10060</guid>
		<description>Sadly the majority of Politicians here in the UK and across the planet have been ambushed by the Global warming zealots, these poor misguided politicicians have been fooled into thinking Global Warming is a vote catching and trendy bandwagon to jump on even though the worlds majority disagrees with it,.

As shown in copenhagen the main aims of the Green zealots is more to do with anarchy and their anti capitalist views, these misguided souls would have us all living and starving in a stone age society.

Politicians are not all as bright as they think they are or they would clearly see that the IPCC amongst others have manipulated their figures and graphs to suit their own needs, they do so because that is whats paying their overly generous wages and financing their scientific grants.

In truth the facts are that their is no change in climate, real scientific facts can prove that provided they are not doctored before they are presented..it is no warmer now than a 1000 years ago...democracy&#039;s across the world should put it to their own people to say how far each country should go in its pursuit of its beliefs or disbeliefs.

If you think by pursuing these ridiculous claims of a global warming apocalypse that you will win the votes and the hearts of the people then you are sadly and very badly mistaken, you will alienate a generation of voters when they see through the deceit which has plunged their generation into needless financial hardship along with a crippling shortage of energy to heat their homes and run their cars or even run a business,

Yes its good to become less reliant on fossle fuels and to be less wasteful, but why should we deny our young the chance of future prosperity when we are still sitting on vast coal reserves which could be generating electrictity,  at very least we should be ditching un reliable and very expensive wind turbines and divert these funds towards nuclear energy power stations.

Sadly you Politicians seem to be far to reliant on think tanks that are extremely biased towards the global warming theme as that is what keeps their services and wages safe.

So please...Enough of this nonsense before we saddle our children and our childrens children in debt in our efforts to solve an issue thats is not an issue at all.

Your party has much to offer,  you would do better to focus on the real issues of your electorate, Things like distancing ourselves from the EU bullies and their mad cap directives, then your party could start to undo and unpick all of the nulab madness laws and bills of the past12 years.

Do not be afraid to disagree with other countries on global warming nor with the EU and their ridculous demands...what your Voters want is an Independant Britain which is accountable only to itself.

If you can do that you will have a long and strong stay as the main Part y in British politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly the majority of Politicians here in the UK and across the planet have been ambushed by the Global warming zealots, these poor misguided politicicians have been fooled into thinking Global Warming is a vote catching and trendy bandwagon to jump on even though the worlds majority disagrees with it,.</p>
<p>As shown in copenhagen the main aims of the Green zealots is more to do with anarchy and their anti capitalist views, these misguided souls would have us all living and starving in a stone age society.</p>
<p>Politicians are not all as bright as they think they are or they would clearly see that the IPCC amongst others have manipulated their figures and graphs to suit their own needs, they do so because that is whats paying their overly generous wages and financing their scientific grants.</p>
<p>In truth the facts are that their is no change in climate, real scientific facts can prove that provided they are not doctored before they are presented..it is no warmer now than a 1000 years ago&#8230;democracy&#8217;s across the world should put it to their own people to say how far each country should go in its pursuit of its beliefs or disbeliefs.</p>
<p>If you think by pursuing these ridiculous claims of a global warming apocalypse that you will win the votes and the hearts of the people then you are sadly and very badly mistaken, you will alienate a generation of voters when they see through the deceit which has plunged their generation into needless financial hardship along with a crippling shortage of energy to heat their homes and run their cars or even run a business,</p>
<p>Yes its good to become less reliant on fossle fuels and to be less wasteful, but why should we deny our young the chance of future prosperity when we are still sitting on vast coal reserves which could be generating electrictity,  at very least we should be ditching un reliable and very expensive wind turbines and divert these funds towards nuclear energy power stations.</p>
<p>Sadly you Politicians seem to be far to reliant on think tanks that are extremely biased towards the global warming theme as that is what keeps their services and wages safe.</p>
<p>So please&#8230;Enough of this nonsense before we saddle our children and our childrens children in debt in our efforts to solve an issue thats is not an issue at all.</p>
<p>Your party has much to offer,  you would do better to focus on the real issues of your electorate, Things like distancing ourselves from the EU bullies and their mad cap directives, then your party could start to undo and unpick all of the nulab madness laws and bills of the past12 years.</p>
<p>Do not be afraid to disagree with other countries on global warming nor with the EU and their ridculous demands&#8230;what your Voters want is an Independant Britain which is accountable only to itself.</p>
<p>If you can do that you will have a long and strong stay as the main Part y in British politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr John Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/comment-page-1/#comment-9867</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr John Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conservatives.com/?p=1038#comment-9867</guid>
		<description>The total contribution to the atmosphere of CO2 as a result of human activities, since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, is 0.011% - yes only one hundredth of one percent . The primary source of greenhouse activity is water vapour and it constitutes 96% of this activity. The CO2 produced by humans is a small fraction of the CO2 produced naturally. No one has demonstrated satisfactorily that the change in climate is driven in any significant way by the CO2 produced by human activities. The IPCC agenda is driven by about  50 individuals, some of whom have made a fortune from their scare stories. A list of 450 peer-reviewed papers which question the assumption that human activity drives climate change has just been compiled. Most of these papers having been published this century. Over 31000 scientists, either working in the climate field or following the research, have signed a petition which affirms that climate change is not caused primarily by human activity. The UK Climatic Research Unit of East Anglia University is a primary source of information for the IPCC and the recently released e-mails and program notes shows just how flawed the data is and the lengths to which these people will go to get any contrary evidence suppressed. People like Ed Miliband say that “climate change has started” without apparently realising that climate change has been going on for billions of years. The Copenhagen conference (Dec. 2009) is like King Canute going through the motions of stopping the tides. When are the politicians going to cotton on to the biggest scam in history and the hidden agenda of those who have been driving the process? I am a scientist who has closely followed the whole sorry story over a number of years and, like many other scientists, am pleased that the edifice is cracking and crumbling as we watch. Yes - let us be more efficient in our use of energy, yes - let us encourage better insulation, yes- let us work to reduce pollution but, oh dear, the way this is being driven is an utter scandal. The destruction of our countryside by wind turbines is a shameful episode in our history which is driven by greed and massive subsidies from the public all cloaked under the flawed banner of  ‘saving the planet.’</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The total contribution to the atmosphere of CO2 as a result of human activities, since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, is 0.011% &#8211; yes only one hundredth of one percent . The primary source of greenhouse activity is water vapour and it constitutes 96% of this activity. The CO2 produced by humans is a small fraction of the CO2 produced naturally. No one has demonstrated satisfactorily that the change in climate is driven in any significant way by the CO2 produced by human activities. The IPCC agenda is driven by about  50 individuals, some of whom have made a fortune from their scare stories. A list of 450 peer-reviewed papers which question the assumption that human activity drives climate change has just been compiled. Most of these papers having been published this century. Over 31000 scientists, either working in the climate field or following the research, have signed a petition which affirms that climate change is not caused primarily by human activity. The UK Climatic Research Unit of East Anglia University is a primary source of information for the IPCC and the recently released e-mails and program notes shows just how flawed the data is and the lengths to which these people will go to get any contrary evidence suppressed. People like Ed Miliband say that “climate change has started” without apparently realising that climate change has been going on for billions of years. The Copenhagen conference (Dec. 2009) is like King Canute going through the motions of stopping the tides. When are the politicians going to cotton on to the biggest scam in history and the hidden agenda of those who have been driving the process? I am a scientist who has closely followed the whole sorry story over a number of years and, like many other scientists, am pleased that the edifice is cracking and crumbling as we watch. Yes &#8211; let us be more efficient in our use of energy, yes &#8211; let us encourage better insulation, yes- let us work to reduce pollution but, oh dear, the way this is being driven is an utter scandal. The destruction of our countryside by wind turbines is a shameful episode in our history which is driven by greed and massive subsidies from the public all cloaked under the flawed banner of  ‘saving the planet.’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Price</title>
		<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/comment-page-1/#comment-9678</link>
		<dc:creator>David Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conservatives.com/?p=1038#comment-9678</guid>
		<description>The first priority for any MP and minister must be the interests of constituents and UK citizens. Focus on ensuring energy, water and food security for the UK and you get my support. Get enviegled into focusing on others at the disadvantage of UK and promoting the true Green agenda of wealth re-distribution and you don&#039;t. It&#039;s that simple.

Rational conservation, re-use and recycling of energy and resources for economic reasons is sensible. The Climate issue and the UN/IPCC/Copenhagen direction is however a massive socialist scam and should be avoided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first priority for any MP and minister must be the interests of constituents and UK citizens. Focus on ensuring energy, water and food security for the UK and you get my support. Get enviegled into focusing on others at the disadvantage of UK and promoting the true Green agenda of wealth re-distribution and you don&#8217;t. It&#8217;s that simple.</p>
<p>Rational conservation, re-use and recycling of energy and resources for economic reasons is sensible. The Climate issue and the UN/IPCC/Copenhagen direction is however a massive socialist scam and should be avoided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realist</title>
		<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/comment-page-1/#comment-9674</link>
		<dc:creator>realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conservatives.com/?p=1038#comment-9674</guid>
		<description>What are you going to do to make sure that CLIMATEGATE dominates the Copenhagen conference and removing the news blackout in Europe on ClimateGate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you going to do to make sure that CLIMATEGATE dominates the Copenhagen conference and removing the news blackout in Europe on ClimateGate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Day</title>
		<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/comment-page-1/#comment-9646</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conservatives.com/?p=1038#comment-9646</guid>
		<description>Sir, I have just read the parties environmental policy and also the parties official position about encouraging communities to embrace the benefits of Wind Farms. Which I wholeheartedly support,. Yet sir your Parties Candidate for Sedgefield Co Durham ( Blairs old patch) states in a huge great advert sent to every household in the area, that the Conservatives if elected to represent Sedgefield will campaign AGAINST onshore wind farms, This has alienated lots of right of centre pro wind activists in the area including me.  So who is telling the truth  Party HQ or Sedgefield party office ?. We require a straight and honest answer if you please.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, I have just read the parties environmental policy and also the parties official position about encouraging communities to embrace the benefits of Wind Farms. Which I wholeheartedly support,. Yet sir your Parties Candidate for Sedgefield Co Durham ( Blairs old patch) states in a huge great advert sent to every household in the area, that the Conservatives if elected to represent Sedgefield will campaign AGAINST onshore wind farms, This has alienated lots of right of centre pro wind activists in the area including me.  So who is telling the truth  Party HQ or Sedgefield party office ?. We require a straight and honest answer if you please.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chamali Fernando</title>
		<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/comment-page-1/#comment-9621</link>
		<dc:creator>Chamali Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conservatives.com/?p=1038#comment-9621</guid>
		<description>Will you champion the need for an International Court for the Environment (&quot;ICE&quot;) to enforce UN treaty obligations and assert fair and equitable environmental rights for all?  Chamali Fernando, Barrister &amp; Advisor to the Coalition for ICE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you champion the need for an International Court for the Environment (&#8220;ICE&#8221;) to enforce UN treaty obligations and assert fair and equitable environmental rights for all?  Chamali Fernando, Barrister &amp; Advisor to the Coalition for ICE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patsy Sergeant</title>
		<link>http://blog.conservatives.com/index.php/2009/12/04/ask-me-your-questions-on-the-copenhagen-summit/comment-page-1/#comment-9619</link>
		<dc:creator>Patsy Sergeant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conservatives.com/?p=1038#comment-9619</guid>
		<description>I would like to echo Phil Grainger&#039;s and David Armitage&#039;s comment about over-population of the world.  We already have a situation on this planet where many people do not have enough to eat.  At the same time we have medical science having ever more success at keeping evermore people alive - both young and old, i.e. the &#039;natural&#039; balance regarding death and population has long disappeared.

All countries should be debating how the world is going to find enough food and shelter for the people&#039;s of the world NOW, rather than wait until the problem overwhelms us - which it will, without a nuclear war!

I would also like to say a very firm NO to Wind Turbines spread  all across the countryside, there should be a public vote about littering whats left of the countryside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to echo Phil Grainger&#8217;s and David Armitage&#8217;s comment about over-population of the world.  We already have a situation on this planet where many people do not have enough to eat.  At the same time we have medical science having ever more success at keeping evermore people alive &#8211; both young and old, i.e. the &#8216;natural&#8217; balance regarding death and population has long disappeared.</p>
<p>All countries should be debating how the world is going to find enough food and shelter for the people&#8217;s of the world NOW, rather than wait until the problem overwhelms us &#8211; which it will, without a nuclear war!</p>
<p>I would also like to say a very firm NO to Wind Turbines spread  all across the countryside, there should be a public vote about littering whats left of the countryside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

